EU Launches “W Social” with ID Requirement – ​​Alternative to X Relies on Identity Verification

“W Social” is set to launch its pilot phase in Europe in May 2026. The new platform positions itself as an alternative model to X. Following this announcement, the SPD, the Greens, and The Left are withdrawing from X. They criticize the platform for disinformation, radicalization, and an aggressive culture of debate. The SPD parliamentary group went so far as to label X a “far-right platform.” “W Social” requires every user to provide an ID document and undergo a biometric facial scan for identity verification purposes. While intended to stop bots, this requirement poses significant risks to data protection, anonymity, and freedom of expression. (deutschlandfunk: 04.05.26)


W Social Implements Identity Verification

The identity verification process for registration requires an official identification document as well as a live facial match. The aim is to ensure that only real individuals gain access, while automated accounts are technically excluded.

W Social aims to become Europe's alternative to X. Mandatory ID verification and biometric facial matching are intended to stop bots.
W Social aims to become Europe’s alternative to X. Mandatory ID verification and biometric facial matching are intended to stop bots.

The platform operators are modeling their approach on procedures used in online banking. At the same time, this creates a significant barrier to entry: users are required to disclose sensitive data before they can communicate.

Parties’ Withdrawal Escalates Dispute Over X

The SPD, the Greens, and The Left justify their withdrawal by citing what they view as a toxic trajectory on X. They criticize the spread of disinformation and the intensification of political polarization. Furthermore, they no longer consider the platform to provide a suitable framework for democratic debate.

The parties’ official accounts will remain visible but will no longer be actively used. Individual politicians, however, will decide for themselves whether to continue using the platform. This collective move sends a clear political signal against X.


Protection Against Bots, but No Anonymity

“W Social” promises fewer fake accounts because every identity is verified. This could make coordinated manipulation more difficult. At the same time, the culture of digital debate is undergoing a fundamental shift.

Anonymous expression of opinion is, in practical terms, eliminated. Consequently, critics, whistleblowers, and citizens dealing with sensitive issues may choose to withdraw. This creates a conflict between protection against manipulation and digital freedom.

Data Protection Determines Success

The operators state that identity data is to be deleted once verification is complete. Nevertheless, a significant risk remains. Images of ID documents and biometric data rank among the most sensitive types of information.

A security breach would have grave consequences for users. Therefore, a technical promise alone is insufficient. “W Social” must build trust before the platform can gain widespread acceptance.

Scroll to Top