In 2026, the automotive industry must rectify the consequences of multi-billion-dollar miscalculations regarding electric vehicles. Stellantis, Ford, General Motors, and Volkswagen (including Porsche) collectively incurred charges totaling around $55 billion. The manufacturers had anticipated a faster ramp-up of electric mobility, but demand—particularly in the US—fell significantly short of those expectations. Now, the industry faces asset write-downs, scaled-back model lineups, new powertrain strategies, and further cutbacks at its manufacturing plants.
Automotive industry adjusts electric vehicle strategy
The picture is particularly stark for Stellantis. The group recorded charges of €22.2 billion (or $26.5 billion). Ford adjusted its electric vehicle strategy by $19.5 billion, and General Motors by another $6 billion. Volkswagen also had to absorb costs of around $6 billion through Porsche.
Image: Shutterstock
Behind these figures lie flawed assumptions regarding the pace and scale of demand. Stellantis, for instance, had aimed for a 100 percent electric vehicle share in Europe by 2030, with a target of 50 percent in the US. CEO Antonio Filosa has since described those earlier expectations as “too optimistic.” Consequently, Stellantis is realigning its product offering more closely with actual demand.
Multi-billion-euro losses do not signal the end of the electric car
However, these massive financial adjustments do not indicate a general collapse of the electric vehicle market. Rather, the automotive industry misjudged regional variations and the speed of the transition. In the US, momentum slumped significantly following the removal of government purchase incentives. Meanwhile, sales in Europe are currently showing strong growth.
In the first half of 2026, registrations of battery-electric vehicles in the EU rose by 40.5 percent. Yet, this growth is not driven solely by greater market acceptance. Government purchase incentives and subsidy programs are bolstering sales in several countries, while high fuel prices make internal combustion engine vehicles more expensive to operate. Added to this are policy instruments such as carbon pricing, designed to specifically raise the cost of petrol and diesel and make electric cars more economically attractive. The German government explicitly cites this steering effect as a key objective of the carbon levy. Therefore, rising registration figures alone do not yet reveal what the actual demand for electric cars would be under equal tax and pricing conditions.
Flawed planning hits plants and workers
At the same time, overcapacity is exacerbating the situation for many European manufacturers. Consequently, Volkswagen plans to further reduce its model range and production capacity. Group CEO Oliver Blume believes that several German plants will lack sufficient capacity utilization in the long term. While management prepares further cutbacks, the works council and the state of Lower Saxony are fighting against potential plant closures and additional job losses.
The issue, therefore, goes far beyond the question of which powertrain technology will ultimately prevail. The automotive industry invested billions before demand, prices, and the political landscape could be reliably assessed. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are pushing into European markets with lower costs and faster development cycles. As a result, it is not just the corporations that are paying the price for this miscalculation; plants, suppliers, and tens of thousands of employees are also being swept up in the restructuring programs.
Author: Blackout News
Sources: Reuters (25.08.26) – Nau Automobile (22.08.26) – Volkswagen Group (04.08.26) – ACEA (23.07.26)